State & Indigenous Profiles

Alaska

Models implemented in Alaska included Early Head Start Home-Based Option, Nurse-Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers. Statewide, 15 local agencies operated at least one of these models.

5,523
home visits provided
including 887 virtual visits
716
families served
761
children served

Ethnicity

11% Hispanic or Latino

Caregiver Education

12% No high school diploma

Child Age

29% <1 year

55% 1-2 years

15% 3-5 years

Child Insurance Status

76% Public

11% Private

13% None

Primary Language

82% English

5% Spanish

13% Another language

Potential Beneficiaries

In Alaska, there were 42,600 pregnant women and families with children under 6 years old not yet in kindergarten who could benefit from home visiting. These families included 57,800 children.

57,800 children could benefit from home visiting

Of the 57,800 children who could benefit —

42,600 families could benefit from home visiting

Many home visiting services are geared toward particular subpopulations. The NHVRC estimated the percentage of families who could benefit in Alaska who met the following priority criteria:

  • Child <1 20%
  • Single mother 18%
  • Parent with no high school diploma 4%
  • Pregnant woman or mother <21 1%
  • Low income 10%

Of the 42,600 families who could benefit —

41% of families met one or more priority criteria

9% of families met two or more priority criteria

NHVRC State Profiles present data provided by evidence-based models, which include both MIECHV and non-MIECHV data. This State Profile includes participant data from the following evidence-based models: EHS, NFP, and PAT. • Missing and unknown data were not included in calculations. • Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. • To protect confidentiality, race and ethnicity categories with 10 or fewer participants were replaced with *. • Public insurance includes Medicaid, CHIP, and TRICARE. • Low income is defined as family income below the federal poverty threshold. • Single mothers include single, never married mothers or pregnant women. • EHS data may be underreported. Data include EHS programs that provided home-based services only. EHS did not report home visits. Data for child insurance status were not included. • PAT data for child insurance status and primary language were not included.