Models implemented in Utah included Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up, Early Head Start Home-Based Option, Nurse-Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers. Statewide, 26 local agencies operated at least one of these models.
home visits provided
including 11,066 virtual visits
3%American Indian Alaska Native
1%Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander
50%Hispanic or Latino
27%No high school diploma
Child Insurance Status
In Utah, there were 212,300 pregnant women and families with children under 6 years old not yet in kindergarten who could benefit from home visiting. These families included 290,600 children.
290,600 children could benefit from home visiting
Of the 290,600 children who could benefit —
212,300 families could benefit from home visiting
Many home visiting services are geared toward particular subpopulations. The NHVRC estimated the percentage of families who could benefit in Utah who met the following priority criteria:
Parent with no high school diploma3%
Pregnant woman or mother <212%
Of the 212,300 families who could benefit —
40% of families met one or more priority criteria
10% of families met two or more priority criteria
NHVRC State Profiles present data provided by evidence-based models, which include both MIECHV and non-MIECHV data. This State Profile includes participant data from the following evidence-based models: ABC, EHS, NFP, and PAT. • Missing and unknown data were not included in calculations. • Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. • To protect confidentiality, race and ethnicity categories with 10 or fewer participants were replaced with *. • Public insurance includes Medicaid, CHIP, and TRICARE. • Low income is defined as family income below the federal poverty threshold. • Single mothers include single, never married mothers or pregnant women. • ABC reported children served, families served, total home visits, and virtual home visits only. • EHS data may be underreported. Data include EHS programs that provided home-based services only. EHS race and ethnicity data include children and pregnant caregivers. EHS did not report home visits. Data for child insurance status were not included. • NFP reported primary language of caregivers. • PAT data for child insurance status and primary language were not included.
Stay up to date on the latest home visiting information.