State & Indigenous Profiles

Ohio

Models implemented in Ohio included Early Head Start Home-Based Option, Healthy Families America, Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters, Nurse-Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers. Statewide, 124 local agencies operated at least one of these models.

134,643
home visits provided
including 19,412 virtual visits
12,810
families served
16,573
children served

Ethnicity

13% Hispanic or Latino

Caregiver Education

26% No high school diploma

Child Age

39% <1 year

51% 1-2 years

10% 3-5 years

Child Insurance Status

95% Public

5% Private

0% None

Primary Language

87% English

8% Spanish

5% Another language

Potential Beneficiaries

In Ohio, there were 623,000 pregnant women and families with children under 6 years old not yet in kindergarten who could benefit from home visiting. These families included 793,300 children.

793,300 children could benefit from home visiting

Of the 793,300 children who could benefit —

623,000 families could benefit from home visiting

Many home visiting services are geared toward particular subpopulations. The NHVRC estimated the percentage of families who could benefit in Ohio who met the following priority criteria:

  • Child <1 20%
  • Single mother 27%
  • Parent with no high school diploma 5%
  • Pregnant woman or mother <21 3%
  • Low income 17%

Of the 623,000 families who could benefit —

49% of families met one or more priority criteria

17% of families met two or more priority criteria

NHVRC State Profiles present data provided by evidence-based models, which include both MIECHV and non-MIECHV data. This State Profile includes participant data from the following evidence-based models: EHS, HFA, NFP, and PAT. • Missing and unknown data were not included in calculations. • Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. • Public insurance includes Medicaid, CHIP, and TRICARE. • Low income is defined as family income below the federal poverty threshold. • Single mothers include single, never married mothers or pregnant women. • EHS data may be underreported. Data include EHS programs that provided home-based services only. EHS did not report home visits. Data for child insurance status were not included. • HFA data for private insurance include other forms of health insurance. • PAT data for child insurance status and primary language were not included.