State & Tribal Profiles

You are viewing historical content. Access the latest data.

2023 Yearbook

New Hampshire

Models implemented in New Hampshire included Early Head Start Home-Based Option and Healthy Families America. Statewide, 10 local agencies operated at least one of these models.

home visits provided
families served
children served


6% Hispanic or Latino

Caregiver Education

26% No high school diploma

Child Age

37% <1 year

55% 1-2 years

9% 3-5 years

Child Insurance Status

87% Public

11% Private

2% None

Primary Language

96% English

2% Spanish

2% Another language

Potential Beneficiaries

In New Hampshire, there were 61,400 pregnant women and families with children under 6 years old not yet in kindergarten who could benefit from home visiting. These families included 76,800 children.

76,800 children could benefit from home visiting

Of the 76,800 children who could benefit —

61,400 families could benefit from home visiting

Many home visiting services are geared toward particular subpopulations. The NHVRC estimated the percentage of families who could benefit in New Hampshire who met the following targeting criteria:

  • Child <1 20%
  • Single mother 21%
  • Parent with no high school diploma 3%
  • Pregnant woman or mother <21 2%
  • Low income 17%

Of the 61,400 families who could benefit —

44% of families met one or more priority criteria

15% of families met two or more priority criteria

NHVRC State Profiles present data provided by evidence-based models, which include both MIECHV and non-MIECHV data. • Percentages may not add up to 100 due to rounding. • To protect confidentiality, race and ethnicity categories with 10 or fewer participants were replaced with *. • Public insurance includes Medicaid, CHIP, and TRICARE. • Low income is defined as family income below the federal poverty threshold. • Single mothers include single, never married mothers or pregnant women. • EHS data may be underreported. Data include EHS programs providing home-based services only. EHS race, ethnicity, and primary language data include children and pregnant caregivers. EHS does not report home visits or families served. The number of children served was included as a proxy for families served. • HFA reports primary language of caregivers.