Scenic photo of Silicon Valley

State & Tribal Profiles

You are viewing historical content. Access the latest data.

2023 Yearbook


Models implemented in Indiana included Early Head Start Home-Based Option, Healthy Families America, Nurse-Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers. Statewide, 66 local agencies operated at least one of these models.

home visits provided
including 89,069 virtual visits
families served
children served


17% Hispanic or Latino

Caregiver Education

30% No high school diploma

Child Age

43% <1 year

42% 1-2 years

15% 3-5 years

Child Insurance Status

89% Public

7% Private

4% None

Primary Language

89% English

8% Spanish

3% Another language

Potential Beneficiaries

In Indiana, there were 376,300 pregnant women and families with children under 6 years old not yet in kindergarten who could benefit from home visiting. These families included 493,400 children.

493,400 children could benefit from home visiting

Of the 493,400 children who could benefit —

376,300 families could benefit from home visiting

Many home visiting services are geared toward particular subpopulations. The NHVRC estimated the percentage of families who could benefit in Indiana who met the following priority criteria:

  • Child <1 20%
  • Single mother 24%
  • Parent with no high school diploma 7%
  • Pregnant woman or mother <21 3%
  • Low income 24%

Of the 376,300 families who could benefit —

50% of families met one or more priority criteria

20% of families met two or more priority criteria

NHVRC State Profiles present data provided by evidence-based models, which include both MIECHV and non-MIECHV data. This State Profile includes participant data from the following evidence-based models: EHS, HFA, NFP, and PAT. • Missing and unknown data were not included in calculations. • Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. • Public insurance includes Medicaid, CHIP, and TRICARE. • Low income is defined as family income below the federal poverty threshold. • Single mothers include single, never married mothers or pregnant women. • EHS data may be underreported. Data include EHS programs that provided home-based services only. EHS race and ethnicity data include children and pregnant caregivers. EHS did not report home visits. Data for child insurance status were not included. • HFA reported primary language of caregivers. Private insurance includes other forms of health insurance. • NFP reported primary language of caregivers. • PAT data for child insurance status and primary language were not included.