Scenic photo of Silicon Valley

State & Tribal Profiles

You are viewing historical content. Access the latest data.

2024 Yearbook

Arizona

Models implemented in Arizona included Early Head Start Home-Based Option, Family Spirit, Healthy Families America, Nurse-Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers. Statewide, 82 local agencies operated at least one of these models.

96,568
home visits provided
including 66,694 virtual visits
7,919
families served
9,169
children served

Ethnicity

59% Hispanic or Latino

Caregiver Education

22% No high school diploma

Child Age

24% <1 year

41% 1-2 years

35% 3-5 years

Child Insurance Status

81% Public

16% Private

3% None

Primary Language

70% English

22% Spanish

8% Another language

Potential Beneficiaries

In Arizona, there were 389,600 pregnant women and families with children under 6 years old not yet in kindergarten who could benefit from home visiting. These families included 500,600 children.

500,600 children could benefit from home visiting

Of the 500,600 children who could benefit —

389,600 families could benefit from home visiting

Many home visiting services are geared toward particular subpopulations. The NHVRC estimated the percentage of families who could benefit in Arizona who met the following priority criteria:

  • Child <1 19%
  • Single mother 26%
  • Parent with no high school diploma 7%
  • Pregnant woman or mother <21 3%
  • Low income 25%

Of the 389,600 families who could benefit —

52% of families met one or more priority criteria

21% of families met two or more priority criteria

NHVRC State Profiles present data provided by evidence-based models, which include both MIECHV and non-MIECHV data. This State Profile includes participant data from the following evidence-based models: EHS, Family Spirit, HFA, and PAT. • Missing and unknown data were not included in calculations. • Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. • Public insurance includes Medicaid, CHIP, and TRICARE. • Low income is defined as family income below the federal poverty threshold. • Single mothers include single, never married mothers or pregnant women. • EHS data may be underreported. Data include EHS programs that provided home-based services only. EHS race and ethnicity data include children and pregnant caregivers. EHS did not report home visits. Data for child insurance status were not included. • Family Spirit reported children served, families served, total home visits, and virtual home visits only. • HFA reported primary language of caregivers. Private insurance includes other forms of health insurance. • PAT data for child insurance status and primary language were not included.