Models implemented in TOTAL included Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up, Child First, Early Head Start Home-Based Option, Family Check-Up, Family Connects, Family Spirit, Health Access Nurturing Development Services, Healthy Families America, Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters, Maternal Infant Health Program, Minding the Baby, Nurse-Family Partnership, Parents as Teachers, Play and Learning Strategies, and SafeCare Augmented.
Statewide, 3217 local agencies operated at least one of these models.
home visits provided
3%American Indian Alaska Native
<1%Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander
30%Hispanic or Latino
25%No high school diploma
Child Insurance Status
In TOTAL, there were 17,790,900 pregnant women and families with children under 6 years old not yet in kindergarten who could benefit from home visiting. These families included 23,080,300 children.
23,080,300 children could benefit from home visiting
Of the 23,080,300 children who could benefit —
17,790,900 families could benefit from home visiting
Many home visiting services are geared toward particular subpopulations. The NHVRC estimated the percentage of families who could benefit in TOTAL who met the following targeting criteria:
Parent with no high school diploma7%
Pregnant woman or mother <213%
Of the 17,790,900 families who could benefit —
50% of families met one or more priority criteria
20% of families met two or more priority criteria
NHVRC State Profiles present data provided by evidence-based models, which include both MIECHV and non-MIECHV data. This State Profile includes participant data from the following evidence-based models: • Missing and unknown data were not included in calculations. • Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. • To protect confidentiality, race and ethnicity categories with 10 or fewer participants were replaced with *. • Public insurance includes Medicaid, CHIP, and TRICARE. • Low income is defined as family income below the federal poverty threshold. • Single mothers include single, never married mothers or pregnant women. • ABC reported children served, families served, and home visits only. • EHS data may be underreported. Data include EHS programs that provided home-based services only. EHS race, ethnicity, and primary language data include children and pregnant caregivers. EHS did not report home visits or families served. The number of children served was included as a proxy for families served. • Family Connects reported families served and home visits only. The number of families served was included as a proxy for children served. • Family Spirit reported children served, families served, and home visits only. • HANDS did not report primary language. • HFA reported primary language of caregivers. • Minding the Baby did not report child insurance status or primary language data. • NFP reported primary language of caregivers. • PAT data for child insurance status and primary language were not included. • PALS reported children served, families served, and home visits only. • SafeCare Augmented did not report home visits or children served. The number of families served was included as a proxy for children served. SafeCare Augmented did not report caregiver education, child age, or child insurance status.
Stay up to date on the latest home visiting information.