State & Tribal Profiles

Washington

Models implemented in Washington included Early Head Start Home-Based Option, Family Spirit, Nurse-Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers. Statewide, 73 local agencies operated at least one of these models.

52,646
home visits provided
5,727
families served
5,197
children served

Ethnicity

43% Hispanic or Latino

Caregiver Education

33% No high school diploma

Child Age

35% <1 year

52% 1-2 years

13% 3-5 years

Child Insurance Status

95% Public

3% Private

2% None

Primary Language

69% English

22% Spanish

8% Other

Potential Beneficiaries

In Washington, there were 422,800 pregnant women and families with children under 6 years old not yet in kindergarten who could benefit from home visiting. These families included 531,400 children.

531,400 children could benefit from home visiting

Of the 531,400 children who could benefit —

422,800 families could benefit from home visiting

Many home visiting services are geared toward particular subpopulations. The NHVRC estimated the percentage of families who could benefit in Washington who met the following targeting criteria:

  • Child <1 19%
  • Single mother 18%
  • Parent with no high school diploma 6%
  • Pregnant woman or mother <21 2%
  • Low income 20%

Of the 422,800 families who could benefit —

44% of families met one or more priority criteria

16% of families met two or more priority criteria

NHVRC State Profiles present data provided by evidence-based models, which include both MIECHV and non-MIECHV data. This State Profile includes participant data from the following evidence-based models: EHS, Family Spirit, NFP, and PAT. • Missing and unknown data were not included in calculations. • Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. • Public insurance includes Medicaid, CHIP, and TRICARE. • Low income is defined as family income below the federal poverty threshold. • Single mothers include single, never married mothers or pregnant women. • EHS data may be underreported. Data include EHS programs that provided home-based services only. EHS race, ethnicity, and primary language data include children and pregnant caregivers. EHS did not report home visits or families served. The number of children served was included as a proxy for families served. • Family Spirit reported children served, families served, and home visits only. • NFP reported primary language of caregivers. • PAT data for child insurance status and primary language were not included.