Models implemented in North Dakota included Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up, Early Head Start Home-Based Option, Healthy Families America, Nurse-Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.
Statewide, 18 local agencies operated at least one of these models.
home visits provided
including 1,914 virtual visits
53%American Indian Alaska Native
*Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander
5%Hispanic or Latino
15%No high school diploma
Child Insurance Status
In North Dakota, there were 49,200 pregnant women and families with children under 6 years old not yet in kindergarten who could benefit from home visiting. These families included 62,200 children.
62,200 children could benefit from home visiting
Of the 62,200 children who could benefit —
49,200 families could benefit from home visiting
Many home visiting services are geared toward particular subpopulations. The NHVRC estimated the percentage of families who could benefit in North Dakota who met the following priority criteria:
Parent with no high school diploma3%
Pregnant woman or mother <213%
Of the 49,200 families who could benefit —
47% of families met one or more priority criteria
17% of families met two or more priority criteria
NHVRC State Profiles present data provided by evidence-based models, which include both MIECHV and non-MIECHV data. This State Profile includes participant data from the following evidence-based models: ABC, EHS, HFA, NFP, and PAT. • Missing and unknown data were not included in calculations. • Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. • To protect confidentiality, race and ethnicity categories with 10 or fewer participants were replaced with *. • Public insurance includes Medicaid, CHIP, and TRICARE. • Low income is defined as family income below the federal poverty threshold. • Single mothers include single, never married mothers or pregnant women. • ABC reported children served, families served, total home visits, and virtual home visits only. • EHS did not require reporting on 2020 data due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of children served in 2019 was included as a proxy for children and families served in 2020. • HFA reported primary language of caregivers. • NFP reported primary language of caregivers. • PAT data for child insurance status and primary language were not included.
Stay up to date on the latest home visiting information.