State & Tribal Profiles

Arizona

Models implemented in Arizona included Early Head Start Home-Based Option, Family Check-Up, Family Spirit, Healthy Families America, Nurse-Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers. Statewide, 80 local agencies operated at least one of these models.

119,842
home visits provided
8,722
families served
10,273
children served

Ethnicity

57% Hispanic or Latino

Caregiver Education

27% No high school diploma

Child Age

29% <1 year

42% 1-2 years

28% 3-5 years

Child Insurance Status

86% Public

11% Private

3% None

Primary Language

66% English

22% Spanish

12% Other

Potential Beneficiaries

In Arizona, there were 384,400 pregnant women and families with children under 6 years old not yet in kindergarten who could benefit from home visiting. These families included 507,700 children.

507,700 children could benefit from home visiting

Of the 507,700 children who could benefit —

384,400 families could benefit from home visiting

Many home visiting services are geared toward particular subpopulations. The NHVRC estimated the percentage of families who could benefit in Arizona who met the following targeting criteria:

  • Child <1 20%
  • Single mother 26%
  • Parent with no high school diploma 9%
  • Pregnant woman or mother <21 3%
  • Low income 27%

Of the 384,400 families who could benefit —

54% of families met one or more targeting criteria

23% of families met two or more targeting criteria

NHVRC State Profiles present data provided by evidence-based models, which include both MIECHV and non-MIECHV data. This State Profile includes participant data from the following evidence-based models: EHS, Family Spirit, HFA, NFP, and PAT. • Missing and unknown data were not included in calculations. • Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. • Public insurance includes Medicaid, CHIP, and TRICARE. • Low income is defined as family income below the federal poverty threshold. • Single mothers include single, never married mothers or pregnant women. • EHS data may be underreported. Data include EHS programs that provided home-based services only. EHS race, ethnicity, and primary language data include children and pregnant caregivers. EHS did not report home visits or families served. The number of children served was included as a proxy for families served. • Family Spirit reported children served, families served, and home visits only. • HFA reported primary language of caregivers. • NFP reported primary language of caregivers. • PAT data for child insurance status and primary language were not included.