2025 YB State Indigenous Landscape Image

State & Indigenous Profiles

Indiana

Models implemented in Indiana included Early Head Start Home-Based Option, Healthy Families America, Nurse-Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers. Statewide, 64 local agencies operated at least one of these models.

144,618
home visits provided
including 15,469 virtual visits
12,052
families served
15,712
children served

Ethnicity

24% Hispanic or Latino

Caregiver Education

35% No high school diploma

Child Age

49% <1 year

41% 1-2 years

10% 3-5 years

Child Insurance Status

86% Public

6% Private

8% None

Primary Language

78% English

14% Spanish

7% Another language

Potential Beneficiaries

In Indiana, there were 368,300 pregnant women and families with children under 6 years old not yet in kindergarten who could benefit from home visiting. These families included 486,900 children.

486,900 children could benefit from home visiting

Of the 486,900 children who could benefit —

368,300 families could benefit from home visiting

Many home visiting services are geared toward particular subpopulations. The NHVRC estimated the percentage of families who could benefit in Indiana who met the following priority criteria:

  • Child <1 20%
  • Single mother 23%
  • Parent with no high school diploma 5%
  • Pregnant woman or mother <21 3%
  • Low income 17%

Of the 368,300 families who could benefit —

48% of families met one or more priority criteria

16% of families met two or more priority criteria

NHVRC State Profiles present data provided by evidence-based models, which include both MIECHV and non-MIECHV data. This State Profile includes participant data from the following evidence-based models: EHS, HFA, NFP, and PAT. • Missing and unknown data were not included in calculations. • Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. • Public insurance includes Medicaid, CHIP, and TRICARE. • Low income is defined as family income below the federal poverty threshold. • Single mothers include single, never married mothers or pregnant women. • EHS data may be underreported. Data include EHS programs that provided home-based services only. EHS did not report home visits. Data for child insurance status were not included. • HFA data for private insurance include other forms of health insurance. • PAT data for child insurance status and primary language were not included.