Family together at home

State & Indigenous Profiles

New York

Models implemented in New York included Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up, Early Head Start Home-Based Option, Family Check-Up, Healthy Families America, Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters, Nurse-Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers. Statewide, 133 local agencies operated at least one of these models.

home visits provided
including 65,272 virtual visits
families served
children served


39% Hispanic or Latino

Caregiver Education

24% No high school diploma

Child Age

40% <1 year

42% 1-2 years

17% 3-5 years

Child Insurance Status

89% Public

9% Private

2% None

Primary Language

71% English

24% Spanish

5% Another language

Potential Beneficiaries

In New York, there were 963,100 pregnant women and families with children under 6 years old not yet in kindergarten who could benefit from home visiting. These families included 1,304,200 children.

1,304,200 children could benefit from home visiting

Of the 1,304,200 children who could benefit —

963,100 families could benefit from home visiting

Many home visiting services are geared toward particular subpopulations. The NHVRC estimated the percentage of families who could benefit in New York who met the following priority criteria:

  • Child <1 19%
  • Single mother 22%
  • Parent with no high school diploma 6%
  • Pregnant woman or mother <21 2%
  • Low income 21%

Of the 963,100 families who could benefit —

48% of families met one or more priority criteria

17% of families met two or more priority criteria

NHVRC State Profiles present data provided by evidence-based models, which include both MIECHV and non-MIECHV data. This State Profile includes participant data from the following evidence-based models: ABC, EHS, HFA, HIPPY, NFP, and PAT. • Missing and unknown data were not included in calculations. • Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. • Public insurance includes Medicaid, CHIP, and TRICARE. • Low income is defined as family income below the federal poverty threshold. • Single mothers include single, never married mothers or pregnant women. • ABC reported children served, families served, total home visits, and virtual home visits only. • EHS data may be underreported. Data include EHS programs that provided home-based services only. EHS did not report home visits. Data for child insurance status were not included. • HFA data for private insurance includes other forms of health insurance. • PAT data for child insurance status and primary language were not included.