State & Indigenous Profiles

Kansas

Models implemented in Kansas included Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up, Early Head Start Home-Based Option, Healthy Families America, Nurse-Family Partnership, Parents as Teachers, and Play and Learning Strategies. Statewide, 102 local agencies operated at least one of these models.

65,201
home visits provided
including 2,467 virtual visits
6,914
families served
9,209
children served

Ethnicity

18% Hispanic or Latino

Caregiver Education

12% No high school diploma

Child Age

17% <1 year

48% 1-2 years

35% 3-5 years

Child Insurance Status

93% Public

5% Private

2% None

Primary Language

70% English

25% Spanish

5% Another language

Potential Beneficiaries

In Kansas, there were 160,500 pregnant women and families with children under 6 years old not yet in kindergarten who could benefit from home visiting. These families included 205,700 children.

205,700 children could benefit from home visiting

Of the 205,700 children who could benefit —

160,500 families could benefit from home visiting

Many home visiting services are geared toward particular subpopulations. The NHVRC estimated the percentage of families who could benefit in Kansas who met the following priority criteria:

  • Child <1 20%
  • Single mother 18%
  • Parent with no high school diploma 4%
  • Pregnant woman or mother <21 2%
  • Low income 14%

Of the 160,500 families who could benefit —

43% of families met one or more priority criteria

12% of families met two or more priority criteria

NHVRC State Profiles present data provided by evidence-based models, which include both MIECHV and non-MIECHV data. This State Profile includes participant data from the following evidence-based models: ABC, EHS, HFA, NFP, and PAT. • Missing and unknown data were not included in calculations. • Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. • Public insurance includes Medicaid, CHIP, and TRICARE. • Low income is defined as family income below the federal poverty threshold. • Single mothers include single, never married mothers or pregnant women. • ABC data are reported for the Infant program. • EHS data may be underreported. Data include EHS programs that provided home-based services only. EHS did not report home visits. Data for child insurance status were not included. • HFA data for private insurance include other forms of health insurance. • PAT data for child insurance status and primary language were not included.